Thursday, 29 April 2010
Clouds
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
Anish Kapoor
http://www.anishkapoor.com/
Figures such as Damien Hirst represent one branch of post-Duchampian art; Kapoor, however, takes on that history in a rather different way. "If Duchamp declared that all the objects in the world are art," he says, "then I am interested in the next stage of that argument, which may have been prompted by Beuys in some way - that all the objects in the world are symbolic. Now Duchamp, to be fair, was very careful about what was the found object; the found object was always deeply symbolic. So the arguments in fact come together and they don't get confused by the idea that you can put anything in a glass case and it's art. It isn't. It is the artist's duty to find poetic meaning in things." More baldly, he declares of the Hirsts on sale recently at Sotheby's: "It's just stuff , you know. It's not an artistic challenge. it's just stuff ... It's completely irrelevant." Later he adds: "It's almost not art. I'm going to go as far as to say it's not art."
Sunday, 25 April 2010
Friday, 23 April 2010
Rabecca Horn
copper, steel, motors, wire, audio, 14x27x31 feet
Caspar David Friedrichs
Friedrich was born in the Swedish Pomeranian town of Greifswald, where he began his studies in art as a youth. He studied in Copenhagen until 1798, before settling inDresden. He came of age during a period when, across Europe, a growing disillusionment with materialistic society was giving rise to a new appreciation of spirituality. This shift in ideals was often expressed through a reevaluation of the natural world, as artists such as Friedrich, J.M.W. Turner (1775–1851) and John Constable (1776–1837) sought to depict nature as a "divine creation, to be set against the artifice of human civilization".[4]
Friedrich’s work brought him renown early in his career, and contemporaries such as the French sculptor David d'Angers (1788–1856) spoke of him as a man who had discovered "the tragedy of landscape".[5] Nevertheless, his work fell from favour during his later years, and he died in obscurity, and in the words of the art historian Philip Miller, "half mad".[6] As Germany moved towards modernisation in the late 19th century, a new sense of urgency characterised its art, and Friedrich’s contemplative depictions of stillness came to be seen as the products of a bygone age. The early 20th century brought a renewed appreciation of his work, beginning in 1906 with an exhibition of thirty-two of his paintings and sculptures in Berlin. By the 1920s his paintings had been discovered by the Expressionists, and in the 1930s and early 1940s Surrealists andExistentialists frequently drew ideas from his work. The rise of Nazism in the early 1930s again saw a resurgence in Friedrich's popularity, but this was followed by a sharp decline as his paintings were, by association with the Nazi movement, misinterpreted as having a nationalistic aspect.[7] It was not until the late 1970s that Friedrich regained his reputation as an icon of the German Romantic movement and a painter of international importance.
[Text from Wikipedia]
He links back to my last project, of the body as a sight of cultural represintaion. As my finished pice was of a person standing srouwnded by clowed.
David Smith
Found this sculptor when looking on google, don't know much about him.
Susumu Shingu
Thursday, 15 April 2010
Jennifer Hall
Interactive SculptureSITE: Thorne-Sagendorph Art GalleryKeene State College, April, 2001
Mariele Neudecker
She has done many solo exhabitions. One that I rember hur showing in the friday event was where she took a casting of part of a Yorkshier wook and took it to Japan. Everything from leaves to the soil on the ground. She recorded the reactions as they enter the room from behind a curtain, the majority of them were shocked. One lady skreamed! gess it must have been quite a saprize haveing part of Yorkshier in a garally.